Abstract

The dependency on fossil fuels can be reduced by the use of renewable energy sources like biomass and it can make a remarkable contribution to the reduction of CO₂ emissions and as a result reducing the carbon footprint hence eliminating the greenhouse gas effect. Biomass materials that go to waste can be recovered through the pyrolysis process in order to produce biochar which can be used as a source of energy for cooking. The aim of this study was to carry out optimization of biochar production and quality using the Response Surface Methodology technique. The parameters varied were feedstock moisture content (FMC) (10%, 15% and 20%), pyrolysis residence time (PRT) (in minutes) 90, 135 and 180 and chimney inclination angle (CIA) (30^o, 45^o and 60^o). An experimental insulated metallic carbonization kiln (1 m high and 0.5 m diameter) was developed and used. Response Surface Methodology technique by using Box-Behnken Design was used to develop a mathematical equation to predict the production and quality of the biochar with respect to varied parameters which was later optimized to determine the optimal conditions for biochar production and quality. The biochar quality was based on its moisture content (MC), volatile matter (VM), ash content (AC), fixed carbon (FC) and pH. The combined optimal conditions were 10% feedstock moisture content, 126.93 min pyrolysis residence time and 30^o chimney inclination angle resulting to production of 44.35%, MC = 3.82%, VM = 23.52%, AC = 2.94%, FC = 67.89% and pH = 9.28. The mathematical equation developed had composite desirability (CD) of 0.9490 at a p-value≤0.05 which made it viable. These research findings are of importance since optimization reduces the wastage of resources resulting into increase in the efficiency of the pyrolysis system.

Keywords: Renewable Energy, Pyrolysis, Biochar, Optimization, Response Surface Methodology

References

Aguirre, J. L., Baena, J., Martín, M. T., Nozal, L., González, S., Manjón, J. L., & Peinado, M. (2020). Composition, Ageing and Herbicidal Properties of Wood Vinegar Obtained through Fast Biomass Pyrolysis. Energies, 13(10), 2418. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102418

Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere, 99, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071

Álvarez-Chávez, B. J., Godbout, S., Le Roux, É., Palacios, J. H., & Raghavan, V. (2019). Bio-oil yield and quality enhancement through fast pyrolysis and fractional condensation concepts. Biofuel Research Journal, 6(4), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2019.6.4.2

Browning, S., Lawrence, T., Joshi, C., & Seay, J. (2020). Analysis of green pesticide production by valorization of husks from Croton megalocarpus tree nuts. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13312

Chandrasekaran, A., Subbiah, S., Ramachandran, S., Narayanasamy, S., Bartocci, P., & Fantozzi, F. (2019). Natural Draft-Improved Carbonization Retort System for Biocarbon Production from Prosopis juliflora Biomass. Energy & Fuels, 33(11), 11113–11124. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02639

Downie, A., Munroe, P., Cowie, A., Van Zwieten, L., & Lau, D. M. S. (2012). Biochar as a Geoengineering Climate Solution: Hazard Identification and Risk Management. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 42(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2010.507980

Graber, E. R., Frenkel, O., Jaiswal, A. K., & Elad, Y. (2014). How may biochar influence severity of diseases caused by soilborne pathogens? Carbon Management, 5(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2014.913360

Haddad, K., Jeguirim, M., Jellali, S., Thevenin, N., Ruidavets, L., & Limousy, L. (2021). Biochar production from Cypress sawdust and olive mill wastewater: Agronomic approach. Science of The Total Environment, 752, 141713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141713

Igalavithana, A. D., Mandal, S., Niazi, N. K., Vithanage, M., Parikh, S. J., Mukome, F. N. D., Rizwan, M., Oleszczuk, P., Al-Wabel, M., Bolan, N., Tsang, D. C. W., Kim, K.-H., & Ok, Y. S. (2017). Advances and future directions of biochar characterization methods and applications. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 47(23), 2275–2330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1421844

Kapoor, L., Bose, D., & Mekala, A. (2020). Biomass pyrolysis in a twin-screw reactor to produce green fuels. Biofuels, 11(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1345360

Mahood, H. B., Campbell, A. N., Thorpe, R. B., & Sharif, A. O. (2015). Heat transfer efficiency and capital cost evaluation of a three-phase direct contact heat exchanger for the utilisation of low-grade energy sources. Energy Conversion and Management, 106, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.023

Mythili, R., & Venkatachalam, P. (2015). Product Yield and Characteristics of Char. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 37(24), 2632–2638. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2012.721862

Omulo, G., Banadda, N., Kabenge, I., & Seay, J. (2018). Optimizing slow pyrolysis of banana peels wastes using response surface methodology. Environmental Engineering Research, 24(2), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.269

Oramahi, H. A., & Diba, F. (2013). Maximizing the Production of Liquid Smoke from Bark of Durio by Studying its Potential Compounds. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.012

Qin, L., Shao, Y., Hou, Z., & Jiang, E. (2020). Effect of temperature on the physicochemical characteristics of pine nut shell pyrolysis products in a screw reactor. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 42(22), 2831–2843. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1618993

Raju, C. A. I., Satya, M., Praveena, U., & Jyothi, K. R. (2014). Studies On Development Of Fuel Briquettes Using Locally Available Waste. 4(3), 7.

Ronsse, F., van Hecke, S., Dickinson, D., & Prins, W. (2013). Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: Influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. GCB Bioenergy, 5(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12018

Song, W., & Guo, M. (2012). Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 94, 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.018

Thibanyane, N., Agachi, P., & Danha, G. (2019). Effects of biomass/coal copyrolysis parameters on the product yield: A review. Procedia Manufacturing, 35, 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.07.007

Wu, W., Yang, M., Feng, Q., McGrouther, K., Wang, H., Lu, H., & Chen, Y. (2012). Chemical characterization of rice straw-derived biochar for soil amendment. Biomass and Bioenergy, 47, 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.034

Zheng, X., Shi, T., Song, W., Xu, L., & Dong, J. (2020). Biochar of distillers’ grains anaerobic digestion residue: Influence of pyrolysis conditions on its characteristics and ammonium adsorptive optimization. Waste Management & Research, 38(1_suppl), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X19893021

Cited by

CrossRef Citation

Google Scholar Citations

Authors

Baqe Sharu Doti; BSc. Agricultural Engineering and MSc.
Agricultural Engineering (Renewable Energy Engineering) both from
Egerton University, Nakuru Kenya.

Daudi Nyaanga: Professor (PhD) and a Senior Lecturer at the
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Egerton University, Nakuru,
Kenya.

Samwel Nyakach: Doctor (PhD) and a Senior Lecturer at the
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Egerton University, Nakuru,
Kenya.

Jane Nyaanga: Doctor (PhD) and a Senior Lecturer at the Department
of Crops, Horticulture and Soils, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya.

Oscar Ingasia: Doctor (PhD) and Senior Lecturer at the Department
of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Egerton University,
Nakuru, Kenya

Article Metrics

How to cite

Doti B.S., Nyaanga D., NyakachS., NyaangaJ. and IngasiaO. (2022): Biochar Production and Quality Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology Technique. Applied Research Journal of Environmental Engineering, 4(1), 1-16 https://doi.org/10.47721/ARJEE202201011